test: add /approve gateway scope coverage (#1) (thanks @mitsuhiko)

src/auto-reply/reply/commands-approve.test.ts

@@ -98,4 +98,52 @@ describe("/approve command", () => {
     expect(result.reply?.text).toContain("requires operator.approvals");
     expect(mockCallGateway).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
   });
+
+  it("allows gateway clients with approvals scope", async () => {
+    const cfg = {
+      commands: { text: true },
+    } as OpenClawConfig;
+    const params = buildParams("/approve abc allow-once", cfg, {
+      Provider: "webchat",
+      Surface: "webchat",
+      GatewayClientScopes: ["operator.approvals"],
+    });
+
+    const mockCallGateway = vi.mocked(callGateway);
+    mockCallGateway.mockResolvedValueOnce({ ok: true });
+
+    const result = await handleCommands(params);
+    expect(result.shouldContinue).toBe(false);
+    expect(result.reply?.text).toContain("Exec approval allow-once submitted");
+    expect(mockCallGateway).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      expect.objectContaining({
+        method: "exec.approval.resolve",
+        params: { id: "abc", decision: "allow-once" },
+      }),
+    );
+  });
+
+  it("allows gateway clients with admin scope", async () => {
+    const cfg = {
+      commands: { text: true },
+    } as OpenClawConfig;
+    const params = buildParams("/approve abc allow-once", cfg, {
+      Provider: "webchat",
+      Surface: "webchat",
+      GatewayClientScopes: ["operator.admin"],
+    });
+
+    const mockCallGateway = vi.mocked(callGateway);
+    mockCallGateway.mockResolvedValueOnce({ ok: true });
+
+    const result = await handleCommands(params);
+    expect(result.shouldContinue).toBe(false);
+    expect(result.reply?.text).toContain("Exec approval allow-once submitted");
+    expect(mockCallGateway).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      expect.objectContaining({
+        method: "exec.approval.resolve",
+        params: { id: "abc", decision: "allow-once" },
+      }),
+    );
+  });
 });